Leave a thought
The Love App That Won't Ghost You Is the One You Already Have
Andrew Ng here. I build AI systems for a living, so trust me when I say this: the problem with online dating isn't the algorithm. It's that we've outsourced the wrong part. Let me define the thing fi
Andrew Ng here. I build AI systems for a living, so trust me when I say this: the problem with online dating isn't the algorithm. It's that we've outsourced the wrong part.
Let me define the thing first, because everyone gets it backwards. Real love is not a matching problem. It's a maintenance problem. Here is why that matters: you can find someone in a week and lose them in a month, and most apps are optimized entirely for the first part.
I watched this play out in my own field. We spent a decade making recommendation engines brilliant at the swipe. Nobody built anything for day 400. The result? People cycling through matches like they're refreshing a feed, wondering why nothing sticks.
Honestly, the research backs this up. Relationship satisfaction over time tracks with how couples handle conflict and boredom, not with how they met (Source: NPR, "The science of emotional regulation"). The 36 questions that supposedly lead to love? They work because they force disclosure, not because the app found your soulmate (Source: Verywell Mind). You can do those questions with anyone. That's the whole point.
So here's my actionable advice, and it's boring on purpose.
First, stop treating the app as the relationship. It's a door. Walk through it and close it behind you. The couples I know who last met online and then deleted the app within a month.
Second, build a shared ritual that has nothing to do with screens. A walk. A dog. A Sunday call. If you're living solo and testing whether you can even sustain connection, start smaller โ the lessons in VentNest Solo about self-companionship apply before you drag another person into your life. And if a pet is your current partner, that's real too. VentNest Pets covers why that bond counts, and why leaning on it as your only support eventually backfires.
Third, and this is the counterintuitive one: use technology for logistics, not intimacy. Calendars, reminders, shared notes. Fine. But the moment you're asking a chatbot to draft your apology text, you've automated the exact muscle that keeps love alive. NPR reported on people whose lives got upended by AI companions. That's not a cautionary tale about tech. It's a warning about what we're avoiding.
The counterpoint is obvious. Some people are isolated, older, disabled, and an app genuinely is the only door. I hear that. But even then, the app is the introduction. The relationship is the thousand small unrewarded acts after.
You want to find true love online? Fine. Then log off and do the unglamorous work. The algorithm can't do that part. It never could.
FAQ
Q1: Can technology actually improve long-term relationships?
Only for logistics. Calendars and shared notes help. But research on emotional regulation suggests the skills that sustain relationships โ lowering intensity during conflict, repairing after โ are practiced, not automated (Source: NPR).
Q2: What are the real benefits of online dating?
Access and speed. It widens the door. The 36 questions research shows the depth comes from disclosure, which you can do with anyone once you've met (Source: Verywell Mind).
Q3: How do I find true love online?
Treat the app as a door, not the room. Meet, then delete, then build a shared offline ritual. The maintenance is the love.